|
Please be warned this HP BladeSystem versus IBM
BladeCenter comparison is biased
toward IBM. For our un-biased comparison please click
HP
BladeSystem vs IBM BladeCenter
|
IBM |
HP |
|
Chassis flexibility
Provides a variety of chassis offerings to meet your specific needs
BladeCenter S, BladeCenter E, BladeCenter H, BladeCenter T, BladeCenter
HT, Common set of blades, switches, I/O fabrics and management
infrastructure |
BladeSystem c-Class, BladeSystem p-Class, bh 5700 ATCA |
|
Blade server flexibility
Provides a large selection of blades optimized for specific workloads
Intel® Xeon®, AMD Opteron, IBM POWER™, Cell BE™ |
Intel
Xeon, AMD Opteron, Intel Itanium® |
|
Legacy I/O support
Provides a more seamless transition from industry-standard rack and/or
tower servers to blade servers
PCI
Expansion Module |
--
PCI
Expansion Module, (c-class only) |
|
Next-generation local storage
Helps improve reliability
Solid
State Drives (SSD) |
-- |
|
Storage flexibility
Provides choices to meet your specific storage needs
External: NAS, FC SAN, iSCSI SAN, SAS
Internal: Solid State, Flash, SAS, SATA |
External: NAS, FC SAN, iSCSI SAN
Internal: Flash, SAS, SATA |
|
Redundancy
Helps provide end-to-end high availability
IBM
designs its blades with redundant connections and its chassis with a
redundant-path midplane |
-- |
|
Illuminated path to blade components
Helps improve reliability by identifying a component in need of
maintenance—even without system power
Light
Path Diagnostics |
--
Limited functionality |
|
Event identification
Helps simplify problem determination
First
Failure Data Capture |
-- |
|
Integrated 10Gb Ethernet switch modules
Delivers additional bandwidth between the blade, the chassis and the
network
BladeCenter H, BladeCenter HT |
Announced on c-Class only, but not available yet |
|
Integrated 4X InfiniBand® switch modules
Provides a high-speed, low latency interconnect enabling I/O
virtualization and HPC
Two
ports/card, managed |
Two
ports/card unmanaged |
|
Blade deployment and redeployment
Helps reduce the time it takes to deploy servers, data and storage to
minutes or hours instead of days or weeks.
Open
Fabric Manager, Uses standard switches, single login across 100 chassis |
Virtual Connect, Uses proprietary switches, single login across four
chassis |
|
Efficient utilization of available power
resources
Helps optimize resources and save money
PowerExecutive™ |
Power
Regulator, Less functionality and over $400 charge |
Other Related Comparisons:
IBM Blade Server vs Dell Blade Server
IBM Blade Server vs SUN Blade Server
HP Blade Server vs Dell Blade Server
HP
Bade Server vs SUN Blade Server
Dell Blade Server vs SUN Blade Server
Hardware
Comparison
Forum:
Please post your requests, comments, opinion, concern, and read other readers
comments at our
Hardware Comparison
forum.
|